We made a new deck builder. We call it Archidekt. : r/magicTCG
WEBBenignLarency. ADMIN MOD. We made a new deck builder. We call it Archidekt. After a year of development, we, the Archidekt Development Team, are beyond thrilled to announce the Open Beta of Archidekt, a new MTG deck builder: https://archidekt.com . A little bit of background on Archidekt, if you care. If not, just skip to the tl;dr: Just over a ...
Archidekt is falling apart... need an alternative : r/EDH - Reddit
WEBSep 27, 2023 · For discussing Magic: the Gathering EDH/Commander! Archidekt is falling apart... need an alternative. I really liked Archidekt but the app has become full of bugs. So tired of having to make the same changes ten times before it remembers and now one of my decks just lost every custom category assignment I had made to the cards.
Deckbuilders: Moxfield or Archidekt? : r/CompetitiveEDH - Reddit
WEBMay 2, 2020 · AnIdealSociety. • 4 yr. ago. For viewing other peoples completed decks with primers I like moxfield better. For actually building a deck archidekt wins. I feel the search is better and the ability to drag and drop cards into premade and custom categories is essential when creating a deck. 29. Reply.
Archidekt is a fine tool for planning a deck and sharing it for ...
WEBAug 2, 2020 · Archidekt is a fine tool for planning a deck and sharing it for critique, but please, organize it!
Do people use Archdekt to play test or is that something else?
WEBNov 12, 2020 · I use Archidekt to build and play test my decks. It's a one sided practice game, but it gives you enough to understand what cards to keep or cut. To play with friends we use untap.in. there are a few websites to play with others though. ProdigyOrphean.
Building your EDH decks with Archidekt or Moxfield? : r/EDH
WEBThe only slight difference I could mention is that Moxfield is more intuitive in use and that Archidekt is easier to build a deck in. I use Archidekt and my friends do but if I had to swap to Moxfield I would not bat an eye. Reply reply. Maiaofshame.
Arkidekt Vs Moxfield : r/EDH - Reddit
WEBMar 11, 2021 · Stats and play test modes are great. What's wrong with TappedOut? I use Archidekt when I want to make a deck fast, but when I'm making a primer TappedOut is what I know best. Moxfield is solid, Arkidekt is really bad. Moxfield >= TappedOut > MtG Goldfish > Notepad > Pen and Paper > Memorization >>> Arkidekt.
Which deckbuilding site you use and why isn't it Moxfield? : r/EDH …
WEBSep 2, 2022 · Moxfield has a better overall UI but Archidekt is dramatically better for viewing decks in visualized piles, which is how I prefer to sort/build. Moxfield cramps stacks too much IMO. Reply reply. Shoranos. •. Archidekt is an absolute nightmare to use on mobile in my experience, which is the main reason I don't use it.
Moxfield vs Architdekt vs others : r/EDH - Reddit
WEBMoxfield is good, particularly for sharing decks and primers as it does a better job of presenting decks, but I find the process of deck building to be a better experience on Archidekt, at least on desktop. They're very comparable in terms of features, I just prefer the builder UX of Archidekt. None of the others are worth mentioning.
Moxfield vs Archidekt - Battle of the Deck Builders.. I'm so torn
WEBJul 13, 2023 · Someone without those preferences, who may prefer moxfields less busy design, is more likely to prefer moxfield. Also, archidekt has this cool feature where you can drag any scryfall image into the deck builder from another tab and it will add the card to the deck. Thats just a super neat feature. Reply reply.
- Some results have been removed