More news
Judge grants Trump's request to pause some deadlines in classified docs case amid immunity questions
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon on Saturday granted former President Donald Trump’s request for further briefing on the issue of presidential immunity in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case and delayed certain deadlines.
The Supreme Court has thoroughly vacated the premise upon which the Founding Fathers instigated revolution in the first place.
Trump wants his hush-money verdict set aside. But a legal doctrine called "harmless error" is more powerful than his immunity, experts believe.
Fox News correspondent Madison Scarpino has more as a judge delays Trump classified documents case to weigh immunity on 'Fox Report.'
Glenn Kirschner and Ian Millhiser discuss how the Supreme Court's immunity decision impacts the many pending legal cases against Donald Trump
The U.S. Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity for official acts has renewed calls for impeachment or "aggressive oversight" against members of the court.
In reading the summary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s immunity decision and the subsequent comments from politicians, news analysts, legal experts and law professors, one would think that democracy is over.
L ast week, the Supreme Court handed Donald Trump a huge win when it ruled that current and former presidents could not be criminally prosecuted for acts deemed “official.” Th
The judge presiding over former President Trump's classified documents case in Florida pushed back some of the deadlines in the case on Saturday to allow for further briefing. Why it matters: Judge Aileen Cannon's order follows the 6-3 Supreme Court opinion allowing presidential immunity for official acts conducted as president.
Opinion: The Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity had Register readers talking about hypocrisy, corruption and tyranny.
The Supreme Court’s stunning ruling giving presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts raises serious questions about orders issued by the commander in chief to the military, especially if those commands clearly violate U.
A landmark Supreme Court decision that reins in federal agencies’ authority is expected to hold dramatic consequences for the nation’s health care system, calling into question government rules on anything from consumer protections for patients to drug safety to nursing home care.
The justices of the Supreme Court should have paused to consider the real-world implications of “absolute immunity.”
The former president requested that Cannon stay some deadlines in the stolen documents case after the Supreme Court ruled the President has immunity for “official acts.”
The Supreme Court's decisions this term affect the presidential election, federal enforcement of environmental rules, gun control and more.
U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted a partial halt in the classified documents case against Donald Trump on Saturday, a day after his legal team asked for a pause in proceedings due to the
Trump’s federal classified documents trial had been scheduled to start in May, though a series of delays pushed that date back, as Trump’s legal team continues to push for delays.
Donald Trump’s lawyers invoked the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling in a filing on Friday afternoon in his federal classified documents case, asking U.S.
This week, the Supreme Court ruled that former president’s have at least “some immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts while in office regardless of politics, party, or policy.” But it doesn’t cover everything.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that grants Trump partial immunity concerning his federal 2020 election interference case, Judge Aileen Cannon paused deadlines tied to his classified documents case,
A federal judge paused some filing deadlines in the classified documents case against former President Donald Trump in a brief order Saturday, and agreed to additional briefings on whether she should pause the case to consider what effect the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling may have on the criminal proceedings in Florida.
Former President Trump has argued prosecutors at his recent hush money trial introduced evidence that is protected under the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling, an assertion that could upend his conviction.
Just one month after a New York jury made him the first former president convicted of a crime, the guilty verdict in former President Trump’s hush money case is already in peril following a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity.
Judge Aileen Cannon denied a major dismissal motion in the Espionage Act criminal case Donald Trump faces in Florida, but she still included some barbs for prosecutor Jack Smith, a legal expert highlighted on Saturday.
With the court essentially finding that the US president is above the law in certain cases, expect a re-elected Trump to be even more emboldened.
The Supreme Court's decision on presidential immunity has been met with hyperbolic claims of death squads and tyranny, but the truth is that presidents are not immune from criminal prosecution for unofficial or private actions,
The Supreme Court found presidents have absolute immunity for exercising core constitutional powers. The team at Trump's Trials podcast broke down how the decision could affect Trump’s legal cases.
President Trump’s valet, Waltine Nauta, will have to go to trial on charges following the rejection by Judge Aileen Cannon of his motion for dismissal of the charges handed up by Special Counsel Jack Smith — though a reckoning looms at the Supreme Court,
The Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity continues to fan the flames of fear and doubt about whether America’s democracy can hold if presidential power is expanded.
Trump has argued that him taking classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago home constituted an official act — and that the Supreme Court's ruling means the charges against him should be dropped.
Judge Cannon has rejected a major dismissal request for a Donald Trump co-defendant in the Espionage Act case in Florida, according to court records Saturday.Cannon, who earlier in the day was put on notice by a former prosecutor who said she was in danger of being removed from the classified
The federal judge presiding over the classified documents case against Donald Trump refused to throw out charges against a co-defendant of the former president.
The ruling causes enormous confusion over the nation’s most fundamental laws and principles, with little guidance on how courts and juries should apply it.
The U.S. Supreme Court ended its term Monday with a highly anticipated decision that provides American presidents with a modicum of immunity from criminal charges. The case was ostensibly about