The first movie came out way back in 2000, and followed Devon Sawa’s character, Alex, after he had a premonition that the plane he and his classmates were on was going to explode — leading to a bunch of them to get off the plane and suffer grisly deaths after the plane did, indeed, kill everybody who had remained on board.

“Final Destination: Bloodlines” opened in 3,523 locations riding in on a wave of strong reviews (93% on Rotten Tomatoes) and viral marketing tactics, including a picture of logs on the back of trucks — a callback to one of the more infamous “Final Destination” death traps.

After that impressionable scene, Todd’s Bludworth would become the most recurring character in the horror series. He returned for the second 2003 movie, where Ali Larter’s Clear from the OG film visits him to get some additional help about cheating death, and later apepared in the third, fifth, and sixth installments.

One horror fan thinks that an easily missed detail from Final Destination Bloodlines links back to the fourth movie, but others are not so convinced. Warning, this post includes mild spoilers for Final Destination Bloodlines, so make sure you are all caught up. But first, read our Final Destination Bloodlines review.

Find out why the directors chose a blood-soaked ending over an alternate survival storyline in Final Destination: Bloodlines. What changed the film’s fate?

Warner Bros. supernatural horror thriller Final Destination: Bloodlines has earned Rs. 22.45 crores in four days at the Indian box office. This is despite the film facing stiff competition from the Tom Cruise-starrer Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning.