An examination of an emerging battle front regarding the controversial Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protecting online platforms from liability over posted content—namely, how ...

An examination of an emerging battle front regarding the controversial Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protecting online platforms from liability over posted content—namely, how ...

The case is Gonzalez vs. Google, and the law is Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. It says that companies like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Reddit — and the Daily News, ...

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, passed in 1996 as part of the Telecommunications Act, has become a political lightning rod in recent years. The law shields online platforms from ...

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which holds that “no provider or user shall be treated as the publisher” of content created by another, is one of the most critical laws ...

It is unusual for a clause in an act of Congress to develop a cult following, but Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act has. The clause explicitly says that the internet should not be ...

Section 230 is a law that passed in 1996 to prevent internet companies from being treated as publishers, shielding sites such as Facebook and Twitter from being sued by anyone wronged by something ...

That’s thanks to Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, which states that “no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of ...

On Oct. 3, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the case of Gonzalez v. Google LLC, a case that concerns Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act involving the 2015 ISIS terrorist attacks in ...