A gun rights attorney reminded Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday that Hawaii is part of the United States, meaning it can’t defy the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday on a challenge to a Hawaii law banning firearms on private property without the express consent of the owner.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday steered clear of a long-running dispute that is testing when foreign governments can be sued in American courts over property taken abroad, declining to hear a U.S.-based Jewish group's bid to recover a collection of sacred manuscripts once taken by the Nazis and now held in Russia.

The Supreme Court has weighed in on Criminal Restitution and called it a "punishment" ... could this change how judges hand out such orders.

In two cases, the court’s conservative majority showed little inclination to strike down laws barring transgender girls from girls’ and women’s teams.

Whether or not the Trump administration has found a loophole in Wong Kim Ark, the court decided this issue with some finality just 60 years ago.

The second, perhaps somewhat less appreciated but no less significant, is the Supreme Court’s ascent—its expansion of its power into areas previously thought to be off-limits. These dynamics share a root cause: the partisan polarization that has reshaped American politics over the past four decades.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments early next year in the challenge to President Donald Trump’s Jan. 20 executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship – the guarantee of citizenship to almost everyone born in the United States.

Under recent Supreme Court decisions, lawsuits alleging federal ICE agents committed abuse have a narrow pathway to get into court.

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters. Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other ...

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a ruling by a federal appeals court that, the Trump administration contends, “has already caused—and, if left in place, will continue to cause—‘untold interference with the Executive Branch’s ability ...

If the Supreme Court rules against its tariffs, the Trump administration would begin replacing them immediately, said Jamieson Greer, the United States Trade Representative.